• T P Klassen, L J Ropp, T Sutcliffe, R Blouin, C Dulberg, S Raman, and M M Li.
• Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
• Ann Emerg Med. 1993 Oct 1;22(10):1524-9.

Study ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to determine whether triage nurses using the Brand protocol would order fewer radiographs than would physicians carrying out standard practice procedures, without missing an increased number of joint or bone injuries; the test characteristics and the interobserver reliability of the Brand protocol; and whether having triage nurses order radiographs could reduce total patient waiting time in the emergency department.DesignRandomized, controlled trial.SettingThe ED of a free-standing children's hospital with approximately 55,000 visits annually.Type Of ParticipantsChildren less than 18 years of age who had a history of extremity trauma in the preceding seven days.InterventionsTriage nurses applied the Brand protocol to determine the need for a radiograph.Measurements And ResultsOf the Brand protocol group, 81.9% had radiographs ordered compared with 87.1% of the control group (P = .03). The percent of positive radiographs was 40.8% in the Brand protocol group compared with 42.6% in the control group (P = .21). There were 3.2% (16) missed radiographic findings in the Brand protocol group compared with none in the control group (P < .001). Patients randomized to the Brand protocol group spent 3.3 hours in the ED compared with 3.6 hours for the control group (P < .001).ConclusionHaving triage nurses use the Brand protocol reduced the number of radiographs ordered but at the same time increased the number of missed radiographic findings. However, having triage nurses order radiographs also significantly shortened waiting time in the ED.

25 keywords...

hide…