• Ashraf Atef and Ahmad El-Tantawy.
• , Tanta, Egypt, ashraf19970@yahoo.com.
• Eur J Orthop Surg Tr. 2014 Apr 1;24(3):403-8.

BackgroundBone loss is very common in high energy trauma. It could be treated either by amputation and prosthesis or by reconstruction of both bony and soft tissue structures. The choice of treatment in a given case must be based on the assessment of the local and general condition of the patient such as regional neurovascular supply, and the residual articular and muscular function. Reconstruction may require bone grafts, tibiofibular synostosis, free microvascular soft tissue or bone transplants. The use of Ilizarov concept gives another option for treatment of bone defects. In this study, infected tibial fractures were treated using Ilizarov concept.Patients And MethodsTwenty-eight patients (20 males and 8 females) with open comminuted infected fracture of the tibia were included. After debridement, all cases had variable amount of bone defects and were treated using Ilizarov technique. Follow-up was for at least 1 year. Filling of the bone defect was achieved either by compression-distraction method in 13 cases (group I) or by means of bone transport in the other 15 cases (group II).ResultsThe results were judged as excellent in 16 patients, good in 9 and fair in 2, while one patient was of poor result. Type of fracture, age of the patient and sex had no statistically significant relation with the final end results. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The average external fixator index was 45 days/cm (range from 35 to 70 days/cm). The mean external fixator index was less in group I.ConclusionIn the management of infected comminuted tibial shaft fractures, bone transport is indicated for the treatment of major bone loss, whereas compression-distraction is suitable only for treating less extensive bone gaps.

23 keywords...

hide…