• Crit Care · Jan 2012

    Impairment of renal function using hyperoncotic colloids in a two hit model of shock: a prospective randomized study.

    • Michael Sasse, Lars Hüter, and Florian Heyder.
    • Department of Intensive Care and Intermediate Care, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany. tsimon@ukaachen.de
    • Crit Care. 2012 Jan 1;16(1):R16.

    IntroductionOne of the therapeutic essentials in severe sepsis and septic shock is an adequate fluid replacement to restore and maintain circulating plasma volume, improve organ perfusion and nutritive microcirculatory flow. The type of solution to be used as a fluid replacement remains under discussion. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of clinically used fluid replacement solutions on renal function and inflammatory response.MethodsA total of 23 anesthetized and ventilated female German Landrace pigs were investigated over 19 hours using a two-hit model that combined hemorrhagic and septic shock. The septic shock was induced using an Escherichia coli laden clot placed into the abdominal cavity. Infusions of 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.42 in acetate (6% HES 130), 4% gelatin in acetate (4% gelatin) and 10% hydroxyethylstarch 200/0.5 in saline (10% HES200) compared to Ringer's acetate (RAc) were used for fluid replacement to maintain a central venous pressure of 12 mmHg. Ringer's acetate was also used in the sham-treated group (SHAM).ResultsAt study end the cardiac output (10% HES200 143±48 ml/kgBW; 6% HES130 171±47 ml/kgBW; RAc 137±32 ml/kgBW; 4% gelatin 160±42 ml/kgBW), as well as mean arterial pressure did not differ between groups. N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamidase was significantly higher in the hydroxyethylstarch 200 (157±115 U/g creatinine; P<0.05) group compared to hydroxyethylstarch 130 (24±9 U/g creatinine), Ringer's acetate (2±3 U/g creatinine) and SHAM (21±15 U/g creatinine) at the study's end. Creatinine significantly increased by 87±84 percent of baseline in the 10% HES200 group compared to RAc and 6% HES130. We demonstrated in the histology of the kidneys a significant increase in osmotic-nephrosis like lesions for 4% gelatin compared to RAc, 6% HES130 and SHAM. Urine output was lowest in the 10% HES200 and 4% gelatin group, however not significantly.Interleukin(IL)-6 levels were significantly elevated in the 10% HES200 group (3,845±1,472 pg/ml) two hours after sepsis induction compared to all other groups (6% HES130 1,492±604 pg/ml; RAc 874±363 pg/ml; 4% gelatin 1,623±1,242 pg/ml).ConclusionsDespite similar maintenance of macrocirculation 6% hydroxyethylstarch 130/0.42 and Ringer's acetate significantly preserve renal function and attenuate tubular damage better than 10% hydroxyethylstarch 200/0.5 in saline.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…