• Y Hirabayashi, M Hiruta, T Kawakami, S Inoue, H Fukuda, K Saitoh, and R Shimizu.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan.
• Br J Anaesth. 1998 Aug 1;81(2):253-5.

AbstractWe compared the effects of the lightwand technique on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation with those of direct-vision laryngoscopy. Forty adult patients received propofol and vecuronium, and their lungs were ventilated for 2 min via a mask with 5% sevoflurane in oxygen, after which the trachea was intubated orally using either the lightwand (Trachlight, n = 20) or the Macintosh laryngoscope (n = 20). Maximum mean arterial pressure changes did not differ between groups during (lightwand group, 25 (SD 21) mm Hg vs laryngoscopy group, 23 (19) mm Hg) and after (21 (24) mm Hg vs 21 (16) mm Hg) tracheal intubation. Maximum heart rate changes were similar for groups during (16 (14) beat min-1 vs 16 (15) beat min-1) and after (2 (11) beat min-1 vs 7 (19) beat min-1) tracheal intubation. There were no differences between the lightwand technique and direct-vision laryngoscopy in changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate during and after tracheal intubation. We conclude that the effects of the lightwand technique on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation were similar to those of direct-vision laryngoscopy.

16 keywords...

hide…