• Kardiol Pol · Jul 2009

    Is it possible to use standard electrocardiography for risk assessment of patients with pulmonary embolism?

    • Maciej Kostrubiec, Anna Hrynkiewicz, Justyna Pedowska-Włoszek, Szymon Pacho, Michał Ciurzyński, Krzysztof Jankowski, Magdalena Koczaj-Bremer, Artur Wojciechowski, and Piotr Pruszczyk.
    • Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Medical University, Warsaw, Poland. maciej.kostrubiec@wum.edu.pl
    • Kardiol Pol. 2009 Jul 1;67(7):744-50.

    BackgroundRisk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is crucial for appropriate treatment selection. Shock and hypotonia are known indications for aggressive management. However, in the haemodynamically stable group the best prognosis strategy is still being sought. Acute pulmonary embolism often provokes changes in electrocardiography recordings (ECG).AimTo assess whether ECG features recorded on admission can be useful for risk stratification during hospitalisation.MethodsWe analysed 12-lead ECG and echocardiography of 56 patients (22 males, age: 64.3 +/- 17.9 years) with diagnosed APE. The diagnosis of APE was confirmed by spiral computer tomography. The ECG analysis was based on the 21-point ECG score including: the presence of tachycardia (> 100 beats/min), right bundle branch block, negative S waves in lead I, negative Q or T waves in lead III, S1Q3T3 complex and depth of negative T waves in leads V1-V4. ECG features were scored from 0 to 21 points. Complicated in-hospital course was defined as need for vasopressor, thrombolysis, embolectomy or resuscitation and the presence of shock index > 1 (heart rate/systolic blood pressure).ResultsFour (7.1%) patients died during hospitalisation and in 8 (14.3%) others complications occurred. Patients with complications had higher mean sum of 21-ECG score compared to subjects with uneventful course [8 (1-17) vs. 3 (0-18); p = 0.04]. Right ventricular contractility dysfunction (RVD) in echocardiography was found in 13 (23.2%) patients, who had higher ECG score compared to patients without RVD [8 (3-17) vs. 2 (0-18); p = 0.004]. The area under the ROC curve to assess the usefulness of 21-ECG score to predict RVD was 0.794 (95% CI 0.665-0.891) and for PPH 0.727 (95% CI 0.591-0.837). The sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value for the value > 3 points in 21-ECG score to predict RVD were: 92, 65, 44, 97% and for PPH: 75, 46, 19, 92%, respectively.Conclusions21-ECG score is a simple and cheap method which can be used to predict RVD and serious complications in patients with APE. A value Ł 3 points in the 21-ECG score can exclude RVD with high probability and limit the need of echocardiography to 23% of haemodynamically stable patients.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…