• Medical teacher · Jan 2008

    Value and face validity of objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for work based assessment of surgical skills in obstetrics and gynaecology.

    • J F Bodle, S J Kaufmann, D Bisson, B Nathanson, and D M Binney.
    • Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Halifax.
    • Med Teach. 2008 Jan 1;30(2):212-6.

    BackgroundChanges in UK Junior Doctor working patterns, reduced training hours and increased patient expectations have resulted in less exposure of Juniors to surgical procedures. Validated methods of assessment are therefore required to assure the surgical competency of future Consultants. Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) forms are one possible tool.AimsTo investigate trainee and trainer perceptions of the value and validity of OSATS in the operating theatre.MethodOSATS forms and feedback questionnaires.Results38 trainees and 16 trainers provided feedback on the OSATS forms used during 60 procedures, returning 119 questionnaires in total. Value : 85% of trainee and 76% of trainer responses agreed/strongly agreed that OSATS would improve trainees' surgical skills. Face validity: 80% of trainee and 76% of trainer responses agreed/strongly agreed with OSATS ability to assess surgical skills.Application76% of trainee and trainer responses agreed/strongly agreed that OSATS should become part of the annual assessment process for trainees.ConclusionsTrainees and trainers perceive OSATS to be a valuable and valid tool for the objective assessment of surgical skills in the work place. More research is required to assess their criterion-related, content, construct and predictive validity as well as their reliability in the workplace.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…