• Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Sep 1996

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Does propofol have advantages over isoflurane for sufentanil supplemented anesthesia in children for strabismus surgery?].

    • S Wilhelm and T Standl.
    • Abteilung für Anästhesiologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg.
    • Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Sep 1;31(7):414-9.

    ObjectiveThe present study investigates the effectivity and the incidence of side effects of sufentanil-supplemented propofol versus isoflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing elective strabismus surgery.Methods130 children (aged 3-11; ASA I-II) were randomly allocated to one of four groups. In group 1 and 2, anaesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and maintained with 15-20 mg/kg x h propofol and 30% O2 in air (group 1) or 10-15 mg/kg x h propofol in N2O (group 2). After induction with either 2 mg/kg propofol (group 3) or 5 mg/kg thiopentone (group 4), anaesthesia was maintained with 0.8-1.5 Vol% isoflurane and N2O in 30% O2 in these groups. All children were orally premedicated with midazolam and atropine and received a single dose of intravenous sufentanil (0.5 micrograms/kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) prior to intubation. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure and pulse oximetry were registered 5 min prior and after intubation as well as 10 min before and 5 min after extubation. The incidence of pain and involuntary movements during injection, oculocardiac reflex (OCR), laryngospasm and postoperative shivering were as well registered as the duration of the operation and the time of extubation. Episodes of nausea and vomiting were documented during 24 hours postoperatively.ResultsTIVA with Propofol resulted in a decreased heart rate (p = 0.002) and a higher frequency of OCR (p = 0.01) than thiopentone/isoflurane anaesthesia with a higher sensitivity of children younger than 6 years (p = 0.007) in all groups. There were no differences in extubation time between groups. The overall incidence of nausea (p = 0.002) and vomiting (p = 0.007) was lower in group 1 and 2 when compared to group 3 and 4.ConclusionPropofol as an induction agent of balanced anaesthesia fails to show advantages over thiopentone. During total intravenous anaesthesia propofol increases the risk of bradycardia especially in younger children. However, a significantly lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after TIVA with propofol and sufentanil, irrespective of N2O administration, may be an advantage over isoflurane anaesthesia in paediatric patients after strabismus surgery.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…