• J Spinal Disord Tech · Jul 2014

    Comparative Study

    Effective cervical decompression by the posterior cervical foraminotomy without discectomy.

    • Min-Soo Kang, Kyung-Chul Choi, Choon-Dae Lee, Yong-Hwan Shin, Sung-Min Hur, and Sang-Ho Lee.
    • *Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Wooridul Spine Hospital, Daegu †Department of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital ‡Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul Gimpo Airport Wooridul Spine Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
    • J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Jul 1;27(5):271-6.

    Study DesignA retrospective review.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of the posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) with and without discectomy for the treatment of cervical disk herniation.Summary Of Background DataAlthough PCF is effective and does not require a fusion procedure, it has certain disadvantages, including a narrow operating field, the need for cervical nerve root retraction, and the obstacle of epidural venous bleeding. Surgeons often find that these limitations complicate the removal of the disk material during PCF.MethodsThe study evaluated 135 consecutive patients who underwent PCF for cervical disk herniation and were followed up for a mean of 36.1 months. Of these patients, 117 were treated with posterior foraminotomy with discectomy (group A); the remaining 18 patients were treated with PCF alone because the disk could not be removed (group B). The clinical data, neurological status, radiologic findings, location of pathology, clinical outcomes, and postoperative satisfaction were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThe 2 groups had similar clinical outcomes. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score for radicular arm and neck pain improved from 7.8 and 5.7 to 4.6 and 3.6 in group A and from 6.6 and 6.2 to 3.4 and 3.6 in group B, and the mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) score from 39.6 and 38.7 to 23.2 and 17.6 in groups A and B, respectively. The success rates in groups A and B were 90.6% and 88.8%, respectively. Radiologic examination found significant differences in operative-level disk softness and disk type between the groups (P<0.05). Protruding, mixed-type, and C4-5 level were more difficult to remove and required more extensive foraminal unroofing.ConclusionsDespite the surgical and anatomic limitations, PCF with or without discectomy is an effective treatment for cervical disk herniation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…