• A Jubel, J Andermahr, C Faymonville, M Binnebösel, A Prokop, and K E Rehm.
• Klinik für Unfall-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie der Universität zu Köln, Germany. axeljubel@t-online.de
• Chirurg. 2002 Oct 1;73(10):978-81.

AbstractThe aim of this study was to compare the results achieved in two groups of 20 patients treated for midclavicular fracture. The first group (mean age 36 years) was treated non-operatively with a rucksack bandage, whereas the second group (mean age 37 years) underwent intramedullary fixation with a titanium pin using a minimally invasive, unreamed technique. At follow-up, which averaged 3.1+/-0.9 years in group 1 and 2.9+/-0.7 years in group 2, the result of treatment, as indicated by the Constant score, functional outcome and cosmetic outcome, was significantly better in the group undergoing operative treatment. Clavicle shortening was significantly ( P=0.027) higher in patients treated with a rucksack bandage. The absolute Constant score averaged 78+/-23 in group 1 and 97+/-4 in group 2 ( P=0.001). The Constant rating scale showed a significant difference between patients with clavicle shortening of less than 1 cm and 1 cm shortening or more. There were two non-unions in group 1 but none in group 2. Refractures were not observed in either group. According to these results, intramedullary fixation with a titanium pin seems to be more advantageous in midclavicular fractures than non-operative treatment. As the operation is well received by the patients, it should be offered to them as an alternative treatment to the rucksack bandage.

29 keywords...

hide…