• Acad Emerg Med · May 1994

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of sinus x-rays with computed tomography scans in acute sinusitis.

    • T F Burke, A T Guertler, and J H Timmons.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Ft. Lewis, WA 98431, USA.
    • Acad Emerg Med. 1994 May 1;1(3):235-9.

    ObjectiveTo determine the sensitivity and specificity of sinus x-rays of patients clinically diagnosed as having acute sinusitis.MethodsThirty consecutive adult, nonpregnant emergency department (ED) patients clinically diagnosed as having acute sinusitis and meeting study criteria were entered into the study. Sinus x-rays were obtained immediately after study entry and sinus computed tomography (CT) scans were done within 72 hours. Radiologic criteria for sinusitis were defined as more than 3 mm of mucoperiosteal thickening (MPT), an air/fluid (A/F) level, or opacification. All films were read in a blinded fashion [CT scans by two radiologists and plain film by two emergency medicine (EM) staff members and the same radiologists]. A third radiologist 'interpreted Ct scans when the initial radiologists disagreed.ResultsSinus CT scans were obtained for 29 of 30 patients. Radiologists interpreted 28 of 29 CT scans identically, with 21 being positive for sinusitis. Sensitivity and specificity of x-rays were 57% and 88%, 62% and 88%, 67% and 75%, and 48% and 100% for the two radiologists and the two EM physicians, respectively. Four ethmoid, five frontal, and five sphenoid sinuses were opacified or had A/F levels on CT scan. No ethmoid, frontal, or sphenoid sinus was interpreted as being opacified or having an A/F level on plain film. Sensitivity and specificity of maxillary sinus opacification or A/F level on x-ray were 70% and 100%, and 70% and 100%, and 70% and 96%, and 70% and 96% for the two radiologists and the two EM physicians, respectively. Mean concordances (kappa) of x-ray and CT scan interpretations for the four reviewers were 0.34 (range, 0.30-0.39) for the diagnosis of sinusitis and 0.77 (range, 0.74-0.79) for maxillary sinus opacification or A/F level.ConclusionsSinus x-rays are less sensitive than sinus CT scans for demonstration of radiographic changes consistent with acute sinusitis. Sinus plain films may not be reliable enough to assist with clinical decision making. If severity of patient illness requires diagnostic certainty, more sensitive imaging studies, such as CT scans of the sinuses, should be considered.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.