-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2002
Review Comparative StudyRadiofrequency thermal ablation versus other interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma.
- D Galandi and G Antes.
- Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Freiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, Freiburg, Germany. galandi@cochrane.de
- Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2002 Jan 1(3):CD003046.
BackgroundHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide. The only possibly curative therapeutic option is surgical resection. Due to impaired liver function and/or anatomical reasons only a low percentage of patients can be treated surgically. For the remainder, several non-surgical treatment approaches have been developed. In addition to percutaneous ethanol injection, transarterial interventions, and several medical interventions, radiofrequency thermal ablation has been investigated in coagulating HCC lesions.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of radiofrequency thermal ablation in HCC patients with respect to clinically relevant outcomes (mortality, rate of recurrences, adverse events, quality of life, and duration of hospital stay).Search StrategyWe searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Current Contents, EMBASE, and CancerLit until June 2001 and further handsearch was conducted. Reference lists of the identified articles were checked for further trials.Selection CriteriaAll randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials investigating radiofrequency thermal ablation versus placebo, no intervention, or any other therapeutic approach were considered for inclusion, regardless of blinding, language, and publication status.Data Collection And AnalysisTrial inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Principal investigators were contacted for further information.Main ResultsOne randomised trial which is still ongoing and only published as an interim analysis was identified. This trial compared radiofrequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection in 102 patients with small HCC. With respect to mortality the trial showed no significant difference between the two treatments (relative risk = 0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.02 to 1.59). Concerning the recurrence free survival the trial demonstrated no significant superiority of radiofrequency thermal ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection (relative risk = 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.46 -1.04).Reviewer's ConclusionsAt present, radiofrequency thermal ablation is an insufficiently studied intervention for HCC.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.