-
Minerva anestesiologica · Sep 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialMaintenance and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane anaesthesia in adult patients. A multicenter, randomized comparison with isoflurane.
- R Ranieri, G Martinelli, I Pagani, P Della Casa, V Zappala, G Pittoni, and A Casati.
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma.
- Minerva Anestesiol. 1998 Sep 1;64(9 Suppl 3):11-7.
BackgroundThe goal of the present multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical investigation was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of sevoflurane and isoflurane during maintenance of and recovery from general anaesthesia in adult patients.MethodsWith the approval of the Ethical Committee and the patient informed consent, 143 ASA physical status I-II patients, aged 18-65 years, were randomized in order to receive either isoflurane (n = 71) or sevoflurane (n = 72) as the main general anaesthetic. After an oral diazepam (0.1-0.2 mg kg-1) and atropine (0.007-0.01 mg kg-1) premedication and a standardized intravenous induction, general anaesthesia was maintained by adjusting the end-tidal concentrations of the inhalational agent for the maintainance of cardiovascular stability. At the end of surgery the anaesthetic vapours were discontinued, and the neuromuscular block was reversed; the following times were recorded: time of eyes opening, time of command response and suitability for discharge from the recovery area. The occurrence of any untoward event was also recorded. Preoperatively and 24 hr after surgery, blood was collected in order to assess renal an hepatic functions.ResultsNo differences in demography, duration of surgery, exposure to the inhalational agent and haemodynamic effects were observed between the two groups. Patients receiving sevoflurane showed shorter times for the achievement of extubation (median: 9 min versus 13 min, p = 0.002), eyes opening (median: 10 min versus 13 min, p = 0.002), command response (11 min versus 15 min, p = 0.002) and suitability for discharge from recovery room (median: 19 min versus 22 min, p < 0.05) than those receiving isofluorane. No intra- and intergroup differences were observed in pre- and post-operative laboratory testing of renal and hepatic function.DiscussionWe conclude that sevoflurane, when compared to isoflurane, provides a similarly safe maintenance but allows for a more rapid emergence from general anaesthesia.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.