• Journal of neurotrauma · Jan 2008

    Comparative Study

    Longitudinal comparison of two severities of unilateral cervical spinal cord injury using magnetic resonance imaging in rats.

    • Georgeta Mihai, Yvette S Nout, C Amy Tovar, Brandon A Miller, Petra Schmalbrock, Jacqueline C Bresnahan, and Michael S Beattie.
    • Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
    • J. Neurotrauma. 2008 Jan 1;25(1):1-18.

    AbstractMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be a powerful tool for characterization of spinal cord pathology in animal models. We evaluated the utility of medium-field MRI for the longitudinal assessment of progression of spinal cord injury (SCI) in a rat model. Thirteen adult rats were subjected to a 6.25 or 25 g-cm unilateral cervical SCI, and underwent MRI and behavioral tests during a 3-week study period. MRI was also performed post-mortem. Quantification of cord swelling, hypointense and hyperintense signal, and lesion length were the most valuable parameters to determine and were highly correlated to behavioral and histopathological measures. Immediately after injury, MRI showed loss of gray matter-white matter differentiation, presence of scattered hyperintense signal and local hypointense signal, and cord swelling in both groups. At 7 days after injury, the spinal cord in the 25 g-cm group was significantly larger than that of the 6.25 g-cm group (p = 0.02). Contrast enhancement of the lesion was seen at 24 h in the 6.25 g-cm group, and at 24 h and 7 days in the 25 g-cm group. The volume of hypointense signal, representing hemorrhage, throughout the lesion region was significantly larger in the 25 g-cm compared to the 6.25 g-cm group at both 14 and 21 days after SCI (p,

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.