• Resuscitation · Jun 2010

    Development of a formative assessment tool for measurement of performance in multi-professional resuscitation teams.

    • Peter Oluf Andersen, Michael Kammer Jensen, Anne Lippert, Doris Østergaard, and Tobias Wirenfelt Klausen.
    • Danish Institute for Medical Simulation, Herlev Hospital, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark. poa@dadlnet.dk
    • Resuscitation. 2010 Jun 1;81(6):703-11.

    BackgroundTreating cardiac arrest is linked to the mutual performance of several health-care individuals' task coordination. Non-technical skills, including communication, leadership and team interaction, could improve sequencing the tasks in the cardiac arrest algorithm. Non-technical skills have been a part of crew resource management training, created to improve safety in aviation. This study aimed, first, to establish crew resource management and non-technical skill-based learning objectives and behavioural markers for the performance of multi-professional resuscitation teams; second, to develop a checklist and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the checklist; and, finally, to develop a simulation-based course including the checklist on behavioural markers, as a tool for learning and assessment.MethodA seven-step procedure was used. Findings from interviews with Advanced Life Support instructors and analysis of critical incidents were used to create learning objectives, assessment tools and course curriculum. Reliability and validity were tested by assessing digital versatile disc (DVD)-recorded simulated cardiac arrests.ResultsA checklist with 22 behavioural markers based on nine learning objectives was developed and embedded in an 8-h full-scale simulation course. Inter-rater reliability of the checklist (intra-class correlation) was 0.9. Concurrent validity (intra-class correlation) was 0.93. Rate of agreement (0.58-0.91) and kappa values (0.03-0.82) on single items varied.ConclusionA full-scale simulation course and a checklist with 22 behavioural markers were developed. Good inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the checklist were demonstrated. Single items on the checklist need refinement to improve accuracy.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.