• Critical care medicine · Apr 2000

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Spontaneous variability of cardiac output in ventilated critically ill patients.

    • C C Huang, Y H Tsai, N H Chen, M C Lin, T C Tsao, C H Lee, and K H Hsu.
    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
    • Crit. Care Med. 2000 Apr 1;28(4):941-6.

    ObjectiveTo define the magnitude of spontaneous cardiac output variability over time in sedated medical intensive care unit patients attached to a continuous cardiac output monitor, and to determine whether high level positive end-expiratory pressure or inverse inspiratory-to-expiratory (I:E) ratio ventilation resulted in greater variability over time than low positive end-expiratory pressure with conventional I:E ratio ventilation.DesignProspective study.SettingMedical intensive care unit in a tertiary medical center.PatientsA total of 22 hemodynamically stable acute respiratory failure patients with a pulmonary artery catheter inserted for hemodynamic monitoringInterventionsAfter being sedated, patients were randomized ultimately to receive pressure control ventilation first at setting A (high positive end-expiratory pressure [15 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]) and then at setting B (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with inverse I:E ratio [2:1]), or vice versa, and then at setting C (low positive end-expiratory pressure [5 cm H2O] with conventional I:E ratio [1:2]). Each ventilation setting period lasted 1 hr.Measurements And Main ResultsCardiac output (CO) was measured continuously. The continuous CO value displayed was updated every 30-60 secs. The updated value reflected an average of the previous 3-6 mins. The coefficient of variation (CV) of CO for each setting in each patient was calculated to represent the spontaneous variability. The mean CO+/-SD and CV of each setting was 5.7+/-1.8 L/min and 4.4% for setting A, 5.6+/-1.5 L/min and 4.6% for setting B, and 5.9+/-1.7 L/min and 4.8% for setting C. Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences between the CVs of the three settings. The 95% confidence interval for the COs for each setting was approximately the mean CO+/-0.1 x mean CO measured.ConclusionsIn critically ill sedated medical intensive care unit patients with stable hemodynamics, the spontaneous variability of cardiac output over time was not significant. High positive end-expiratory pressure (15 cm H2O) and inverse ratio ventilation (2:1) did not contribute to increased spontaneous variability of cardiac output.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…