-
Comparative Study
Validation of the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain.
- Edibe Yakut, Tülin Düger, Cigdem Oksüz, Selma Yörükan, Kemal Ureten, Deran Turan, Tüzün Frat, Sedat Kiraz, Nuray Krd, Hülya Kayhan, Yavuz Yakut, and Cagatay Güler.
- School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. yyakut@hacettepe.edu.tr
- Spine. 2004 Mar 1;29(5):581-5; discussion 585.
Study DesignValidation of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire.ObjectivesTo translate and culturally adapt the Turkish version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (2.0), and to validate its use for assessing disability in Turkish patients with low back pain.Summary Of Background DataThe ODI is a reliable evaluation instrument for disability, but no validated Turkish version is available.MethodsA total of 95 outpatients with low back pain were assessed by the ODI. Sixty-five of these patients were observed on a second occasion. Translation/retranslation of the ENG version of the ODI was done blindly and independently by four different individuals, and adapted by a team. Individuals were given the ODI and other scales (Visual Analog Scale, Schober Test, and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) on their first visit and a week later.ResultsScores of the two ODIs were 27.10 (SD 16.22) on day 1 and 22.88 (SD 13.94) on day 7, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of r = 0.938 (P < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.918 (day 1) and 0.895 (day 7) in the validation. Concurrent validity, measured by comparing ODI responses with the results of Visual Analog Scale and Schober test, was r = 0.367 (P < 0.01), r = -0.068 (P = 0.591) for day 1, and r = 0.392 (P < 0.01), r = -0.041 (P = 0.745) for day 7, respectively. Construct validity, tested by determining the correlation between the Turkish ODI and the Turkish adaptation of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, yielded r = 0.815 (P < 0.001) on day 1 and r = 0.708 (P < 0.001) on day 7.ConclusionThe Turkish version of ODI has good comprehensibility, internal consistency, and validity and is an adequate and useful instrument for the assessment of disability in patients with low back pain.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.