• D Hänggi, B Turowski, K Beseoglu, M Yong, and H J Steiger.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany. Daniel.Haenggi@uni-duesseldorf.de
• AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Jun 1;29(6):1053-60.

Background And PurposeThe efficacy of intra-arterial administration of nimodipine (IAN) in patients with severe vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains unproved. The goal of the present study was to investigate the clinical effect and cerebral perfusion after IAN in patients with severe vasospasm refractory to hemodynamic treatment.Materials And MethodsTwenty-six of 214 patients with aneurysmal SAH were included in the prospective study, approved by the local ethics committee. All patients met the criteria of medically refractory cerebral vasospasm. Effectiveness was monitored angiographically by digital subtraction angiography and by transcranial Doppler (TCD), perfusion CT (PCT), and neurologic examination during treatment course and follow-up.ResultsNo angiographic effect was observed in 8 patients. The pooled PCT values revealed a reduction of time to peak (P = .03) and mean transit time (P = .17) 1 day after intervention. This effect did not persist during the following days. The pooled TCD analysis demonstrated a transient increase in flow 1 day after intervention (P = .03). No trend was evident during the next 7 days after intervention. Additional infarction was experienced by 61.1% of patients.ConclusionsIAN in a selective patient group resulted in a positive response with reduction of angiographic vasospasm and increase in cerebral perfusion as detected by PCT after 24 hours. Therefore, IAN appears more effective than intra-arterial papaverine. Nevertheless the efficacy of IAN is temporary. Therefore, the search for more effective treatment strategies to reduce critical vasospasm and to improve cerebral perfusion must be continued.

25 keywords...

hide…