• Surgical endoscopy · Jul 2002

    Specific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery.

    • K Roth, P Heeg, and R Reichl.
    • SMP GmbH, Pruefen, Validieren, Forschen, Waldhoernlestrasse 22, 72072 Tübingen, Germany. kroth@smpgmbh.com
    • Surg Endosc. 2002 Jul 1;16(7):1091-7.

    ObjectiveTo determine whether reprocessed single-use devices (SUD) would (1) meet regulatory standards for sterility, and (2) meet the same material standards as new devices or if they pose an infection risk to other patients.DesignThe study included in the first stage single-use laparoscopic dissection devices and in the second stage a variety of clinically used and reprocessed SUDs. The suitability of these devices for cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization was examined.MethodsTesting of cleanability was conducted on devices contaminated with radioactively labeled blood. Instruments were cleaned using hospital recommended practices. Gamma counts/second were determined before and after cleaning to localize contaminants, which were additionally visualized using light and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to quantify contamination elements on the materials tested. Residual bioburden testing on instruments contaminated with microorganisms suspended in blood prior to reprocessing was carried out to establish the efficacy of disinfection and sterilization.ResultsDuring the first stage of the study all devices remained contaminated after cleaning, but were effectively disinfected. Sterilization could not eliminate the challenge microorganisms completely. The findings during the second stage--examination of clinically used devices--were as follows: 11% of the sterile packages were damaged; 33% of the devices were incomplete and parts were missing; 54% did not meet the criteria for functionality; light microscopy, SEM, and XPS showed contamination on the outside and inside of all devices. Of the tested SUDs, 40% remained unsterile following resterilization.ConclusionsNone of the reprocessed SUDs were effectively cleaned or sterilized. This may provide an opportunity for survival and growth of non-resistant or nosocomial organisms and viruses. The use of such inadequately reprocessed SUDs increases the risk for the patient, and can lead to nosocomial infection and to legal consequences for the health care facility.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.