• Am. J. Surg. · Nov 2011

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study.

    • Mustafa Ates, Abuzer Dirican, Mehmet Sarac, Ahmet Aslan, and Cemil Colak.
    • Department of General Surgery, Malatya State Hospital, Malatya, Turkey. drmustafaates@hotmail.com
    • Am. J. Surg. 2011 Nov 1;202(5):568-73.

    BackgroundPilonidal sinus is a common disease that mostly affects young people. Although various surgical techniques have been described for treating sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease (SPD), controversy still exists as to the best surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency and short-term and long-term results of the Karydakis flap with that of the Limberg flap for treating SPD.MethodsIn this prospective randomized study, 269 patients with SPD were recruited to undergo either the Karydakis flap (n = 135) or the Limberg flap (n = 134) procedure between September 2004 and September 2008.ResultsThe mean operative time for the Karydakis group (42.32 ± 8.64 minutes) was shorter than that for the Limberg group (50.14 ± 6.96 minutes) (P = .01). The complication rate for the Karydakis group (n = 15 [11.1%]) was lower than that for the Limberg group (n = 28 [20.8%]) (P = .029). The visual analogue scale score for postoperative pain at the operation site on the 30th day was lower in the Karydakis group than in the Limberg group (2.22 ± 1.01 vs 3.23 ± 1.14, P = .01). The visual analogue scale score for satisfaction with the cosmetic appearance of the scars in the Karydakis group was 7.08 ± 1.75, whereas it was 3.16 ± 1.40 in the Limberg group at the 3rd month (P = .01). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the Karydakis group than in the Limberg group (3.40 ± .94 vs 3.8 ± 1.19 days, P = .03). Only 4 patients in the Karydakis group developed recurrence (3%), whereas 9 patients (6.9%) did so in the Limberg group (P = .151).ConclusionsThe Karydakis flap procedure should be chosen instead of the Limberg flap for treating uncomplicated SPD because of its lower postoperative complication rate, lower pain scores, shorter operation time and length of hospital stay, and good cosmetic satisfaction. However, no differences existed between the 2 surgical procedures in terms of recurrence prevention.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.