• Laxmaiah Manchikanti, Rajeev Manchukonda, Vidyasagar Pampati, Kim S Damron, and Carla D McManus.
• Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, USA. drm@apex.net
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Apr 1;88(4):449-55.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the prevalence of facet joint pain in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) after surgical intervention(s).DesignA prospective, nonrandomized, consecutive study.SettingAn ambulatory interventional pain management setting.ParticipantsThe prevalence of facet joint pain was evaluated in patients with CLBP after various surgical intervention(s) referred to an interventional pain management practice. The sample was derived from 282 patients with persistent CLBP after various surgical intervention(s). Of these, 242 patients consented to undergo interventional techniques. A total of 117 consecutive patients with chronic, nonspecific low back pain, after lumbar surgical intervention(s) were evaluated with controlled, comparative local anesthetic blocks.InterventionsControlled, comparative local anesthetic blocks (1% lidocaine or 1% lidocaine followed by .25% bupivacaine) under fluoroscopic visualization using 0.5mL to block each facet joint nerve.Main Outcome MeasuresA positive response was defined as at least 80% reduction of pain with ability to perform previously painful movements. A positive response was considered to be pain relief from the lidocaine block lasting at least 1 hour or at least 2 hours or greater than duration of relief with lidocaine when bupivacaine was used. Controlled, comparative local anesthetic blocks were used to eliminate false-positive results. Valid information is only obtained by performing controlled blocks in the form of comparative local anesthetic blocks, in which, on 2 separate occasions, the same joint is anesthetized by using local anesthetics with different durations of action. If patients obtained appropriate response with both blocks, they were considered a positive. If they obtained appropriate response with lidocaine but not with bupivacaine, they were considered false-positive, whereas if the response was negative with lidocaine, they were considered negative.ResultsThe prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in patients with recurrent pain after various surgical intervention(s) was 16% (95% confidence interval, 9%-23%). The false-positive rate with a single block with lidocaine was 49%.ConclusionsFacet joints are clinically important pain generators in a small but significant proportion of patients with recurrent CLBP after various surgical intervention(s).

21 keywords...

hide…