• Bmc Fam Pract · Jan 2009

    Comparative Study

    Patient- and system-related barriers for the earlier diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

    • Terry L Wahls and Ika Peleg.
    • VA Iowa City Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. Terry.Wahls@va.gov
    • Bmc Fam Pract. 2009 Jan 1;10:65.

    BackgroundA cohort of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients represents an opportunity to study missed opportunities for earlier diagnosis.Primary ObjectiveTo study the epidemiology of diagnostic delays and failures to offer/complete CRC screening.Secondary ObjectiveTo identify system- and patient-related factors that may contribute to diagnostic delays or failures to offer/complete CRC screening.MethodsSettingRural Veterans Administration (VA) Healthcare system.ParticipantsCRC cases diagnosed within the VA between 1/1/2000 and 3/1/2007.Data Sourcesprogress notes, orders, and pathology, laboratory, and imaging results obtained between 1/1/1995 and 12/31/2007. Completed CRC screening was defined as a fecal occult blood test or flexible sigmoidoscopy (both within five years), or colonoscopy (within 10 years); delayed diagnosis was defined as a gap of more than six months between an abnormal test result and evidence of clinician response. A summary abstract of the antecedent clinical care for each patient was created by a certified gastroenterologist (GI), who jointly reviewed and coded the abstracts with a general internist (TW).ResultsThe study population consisted of 150 CRC cases that met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 69.04 (range 35-91); 99 (66%) were diagnosed due to symptoms; 61 cases (46%) had delays associated with system factors; of them, 57 (38% of the total) had delayed responses to abnormal findings. Fifteen of the cases (10%) had prompt symptom evaluations but received no CRC screening; no patient factors were identified as potentially contributing to the failure to screen/offer to screen. In total, 97 (65%) of the cases had missed opportunities for early diagnosis and 57 (38%) had patient factors that likely contributed to the diagnostic delay or apparent failure to screen/offer to screen.ConclusionMissed opportunities for earlier CRC diagnosis were frequent. Additional studies of clinical data management, focusing on following up abnormal findings, and offering/completing CRC screening, are needed.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…