• Am J Disaster Med · Jan 2015

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of START triage categories to emergency department triage levels to determine need for urgent care and to predict hospitalization.

    • Rick Hong, Ryan Sexton, Benjamin Sweet, Gerard Carroll, Caitlin Tambussi, and Brigitte M Baumann.
    • Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey.
    • Am J Disaster Med. 2015 Jan 1;10(1):13-21.

    ObjectiveTo compare Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage levels and Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage colors for urgent care and hospitalization.DesignCross sectional.SettingInner city emergency department (ED).ParticipantsPatients years transported by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) participating in the state triage tag exercise, October 9-15, 2011.InterventionsEMS assigned each patient a START triage tag. ED staff recorded tag number and color. Demographics, vital signs, 22 emergent interventions, and disposition were obtained via chart review. Institutional review board approval was obtained.Main Outcome MeasuresPresence of more than two abnormal vital sign on arrival and need for more than one emergent intervention in ED were considered indicators of acuity and severity. START triage colors were recategorized as urgent (Red, Yellow) and less acute (Green, White), and ESI was recategorized as urgent (1, 2, 3) and less acute (4, 5).ResultsBoth ED and EMS staff were blinded to the study, and 95% confidence intervals were presented for statistical significance. Of 233 participants, START triage colors were Black=0, Red=12 percent, Yellow=26 percent, Green=53 percent, and White=9 percent. ESI triage levels were level 1=1 percent, level 2=34 percent, level 3=51 percent, level 4=14 percent, and level 5=1 percent. ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 88 percent (75-95 percent) of 49 patients with abnormal vital signs; START (Red, Yellow) only identified 51 percent (35-64 percent). Twenty-one patients needed emergent intervention. ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 95 percent (76-99 percent) of these patients; START (Red, Yellow) identified 33 percent (17-55 percent). ESI (1, 2, 3) identified 98 percent of the 96(92-100 percent) admitted patients; only 48 percent (38-58 percent) were tagged START (Red, Yellow).ConclusionESI better identified patients with abnormal vital signs, those who needed emergent interventions, and those admitted than START.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…