• J Orthop Trauma · May 2012

    Functional outcomes in women after high-energy pelvic ring injury.

    • Heather A Vallier, Beth Ann Cureton, Dianne Schubeck, and Xiao-Feng Wang.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA. hvallier@metrohealth.org
    • J Orthop Trauma. 2012 May 1;26(5):296-301.

    ObjectivesResidual dysfunction after pelvic trauma has been previously described, but limited functional outcome data are available in the female population after high-energy pelvic ring injury. The purposes of this study were to determine functional outcomes and to characterize factors predictive of outcome.DesignProspective collection of functional outcomes data.SettingLevel I trauma center.Patients/ParticipantsEighty-seven women with mean age of 33.5 years and mean Injury Severity Score of 23.1 were included. The Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification included 32 B-type and 55 C-type fractures. Four were open fractures and six had bladder ruptures.InterventionForty-nine patients were treated operatively and 38 nonoperatively.Main Outcome MeasurementsMusculoskeletal Functional Assessment (MFA) questionnaires were completed after a minimum of 16 months and a mean of 41 months of follow-up.ResultsThe mean MFA score was 33. Only 15 women (17.2%) had MFA scores comparable with an uninjured reference value (9.3), and 34 (39.1%) had better than the reference value for prior hip injury (25.5). Anteroposterior compression injuries had worse scores versus other patterns (48.3 vs 31.0, P = 0.01), and trends toward worse outcomes were noted after symphyseal disruption (P = 0.11) and transsymphyseal plating (P = 0.09). Sacral fracture or sacroiliac injury, amount of initial or final displacement, and type of posterior ring treatment were not associated with MFA scores. Mean scores were 32.3 after surgery and 34.0 after nonoperative management (P = 0.67). Functional outcomes were not related to age or Injury Severity Score, but isolated pelvis fractures had better MFA scores (21.1 vs 35.5, P = 0.008) and worse MFA scores (41.7 vs 29.1, P = 0.004) were seen with other lower extremity fractures. Those with bladder ruptures (n = 6) also had poor outcomes, mean MFA 50.0 (P = 0.078).ConclusionsWide variation is seen in functional outcome of women after high-energy pelvic ring fracture as measured by the MFA with mean scores demonstrating substantial residual dysfunction. Better outcomes were noted after isolated fractures and in women who had not sustained other fractures in their lower extremities. History of bladder rupture or anteroposterior compression injury was associated with poor MFA scores.Level Of EvidencePrognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.