• H Habazettl, B Vollmar, F Röhrich, P Conzen, A Doenicke, and A Baethmann.
• Institut für Chirurgische Forschung, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München.
• Anaesthesist. 1992 Aug 1; 41 (8): 448-56.

BackgroundPropanidid, an ultra-short-acting i.v. anaesthetic agent, was widely used in the 1960s. Reports of anaphylactoid reactions in patients associated with release of histamine following administration of the drug, however, led to withdrawal of this useful anaesthetic. Since the adverse side effects of the former solution could be attributed to the solvent cremophor, attempts have recently been made to produce a propanidid solution without addition of the solvent. We report on comparative investigations employing a new liposomal solution (B. Braun, Melsungen, FRG) and the conventional cremophor preparation with regard to anaesthetic properties, haemodynamic side effects, and electroencephalographic effects (EEG).MethodsSprague-Dawley rats (n = 46) were implanted with venous and arterial lines and epidural EEG electrodes during chloral-hydrate anaesthesia. The following day, arterial blood pressure (ABP), heart rate (HR), and EEG were monitored in awake animals and then after induction of anaesthesia by a bolus of the respective propanidid preparation, followed by an infusion period of 15 min in six different experimental groups. Animals of groups L-60, L-90, L-120, or C-60, C-90, or C-120 groups received 60, 90, or 120 mg.100 g-1.h-1 of the liposomal (L) or cremophor (C) preparation. During anaesthesia, the corneal reflex and nociception to tail-clamping were also tested. At termination of the infusion, blood samples were drawn for determination of plasma propanidid concentrations.ResultsBoth preparations were similarly effective in induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in a dose-dependent manner; both similarly lowered ABP and HR. The corneal reflex and nociceptive responses to tail clamping were also comparably suppressed. However, whereas the liposomal preparation was well tolerated at higher dose levels, the cremophor preparation caused considerable dose-dependent mortality of 11%, 86%, and 86% in animals in groups C-60, C-90, and C-120, respectively. Both preparations were found to induce a burst-suppression pattern in the EEG associated with clonic seizures, with a lower incidence with the liposomal preparation (22% and 50% in groups L-90 and L-120) as compared to the cremophor preparation (100% and 89% in groups C-90 and C-120). A remarkable variability in propanidid plasma concentrations was found at the end of the infusion period, although no differences were observed between both preparations. Discontinuation of infusion of propanidid resulted in rapid awakening (less than 5 min), irrespective of whether the liposomal or conventional preparation was employed.ConclusionThe present findings demonstrate largely identical anaesthetic potencies of a new liposomal solution as compared to the conventional cremophor preparation of propanidid. The liposomal preparation, however, was superior as far as tolerance and incidence of clonic seizures was concerned. The present findings should prompt further studies on the suitability of liposomal propanidid as a short-acting anaesthetic agent in patients.

16 keywords...

hide…