• Andrew T Schlussel, Danielle B Holt, Eric A Crawley, Michael B Lustik, Charles E Wade, and Catherine Ft Uyehara.
• Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Tripler AMC, Hawaii, USA.
• J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):731-40.

BackgroundIntensive insulin therapy and degree of glycemic control in critically ill patients remains controversial, particularly in patients with diabetes mellitus. We hypothesized that diabetic patients who achieved tight glucose control with continuous insulin therapy would have less morbidity and lower mortality than diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood glucose.MethodA retrospective chart review was performed on 395 intensive care unit (ICU) patients that included 235 diabetic patients. All patients received an intravenous insulin protocol targeted to a blood glucose (BG) level of 80-140 mg/dl. Outcomes were compared between (a) nondiabetic and diabetic patients, (b) diabetic patients with controlled BG levels (80-140 mg/dl) versus uncontrolled levels (>140 mg/dl), and (c) diabetic survivors and nonsurvivors.ResultsDiabetic patients had a shorter ICU stay compared to nondiabetic patients (10 ± 0.7 vs 13 ± 1.1, p = .01). The mean BG of the diabetic patients was 25% higher on average in the uncontrolled group than in the controlled (166 ± 26 vs 130 ± 9.4 mg/dl, p < .01). There was no difference in ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) between diabetic patients who were well controlled compared to those who were uncontrolled. Diabetic nonsurvivors had a significantly higher incidence of hypoglycemia (BG <60 mg/dl) compared to diabetic survivors.ConclusionThe results showed that a diagnosis of diabetes was not an independent predictor of mortality, and that diabetic patients who were uncontrolled did not have worse outcomes. Diabetic nonsurvivors were associated with a greater amount of hypoglycemic episodes, suggesting these patients may benefit from a more lenient blood glucose protocol.© 2011 Diabetes Technology Society.

28 keywords...

hide…