• A Feldheiser, O Aziz, G Baldini, B P B W Cox, K C H Fearon, L S Feldman, T J Gan, R H Kennedy, O Ljungqvist, D N Lobo, T Miller, F F Radtke, T Ruiz Garces, T Schricker, M J Scott, J K Thacker, L M Ytrebø, and F Carli.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Campus Charité, Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum Charité, University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Mar 1; 60 (3): 289-334.

BackgroundThe present interdisciplinary consensus review proposes clinical considerations and recommendations for anaesthetic practice in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) programme.MethodsStudies were selected with particular attention being paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined and reviewed. The group reached a consensus recommendation after critical appraisal of the literature.ResultsThis consensus statement demonstrates that anaesthesiologists control several preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative ERAS elements. Further research is needed to verify the strength of these recommendations.ConclusionsBased on the evidence available for each element of perioperative care pathways, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society presents a comprehensive consensus review, clinical considerations and recommendations for anaesthesia care in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery within an ERAS programme. This unified protocol facilitates involvement of anaesthesiologists in the implementation of the ERAS programmes and allows for comparison between centres and it eventually might facilitate the design of multi-institutional prospective and adequately powered randomized trials.© 2015 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

12 keywords...

hide…