• J Giner, P Casan, J Belda, H Litvan, and J Sanchis.
• Departament de Pneumologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Facultad de Medicina UAB Barcelona.
• Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2000 Feb 1;47(2):63-6.

IntroductionArterial puncture is a painful procedure requiring prior local anesthesia. Various products are available for pain relief, among them EMLA anesthetic cream.ObjectiveTo compare pain from simple puncture of the radial artery performed with or without application of EMLA anesthetic cream and after infiltration of mepivacaine.Patients And MethodsA prospective, random double-blind study of 153 patients in three groups: group A, 51 patients who were applied 1 g of EMLA cream; group B, 52 patients who were applied 1 g of placebo cream; and group C, 50 patients who received infiltration of 0.2 ml of 1% mepivacaine. Pain was assessed on a 10 cm visual analog scale (0, absence of pain; 10, greatest imaginable pain).ResultsPain intensity reported by the patients was 2.6 +/- 1.8 in group A, 2.9 +/- 1.8 in group B and 1.6 +/- 1.8 in group C. The results for group C were statistically different from those for groups A and B. The difference between groups A (EMLA) and B (placebo), however, was not statistically significant.ConclusionsMepivacaine infiltration is the more effective method for minimizing pain from puncture of the radial artery. EMLA anesthetic cream is not effective against pain caused by this procedure.

19 keywords...

hide…