• M S Broder, D E Kanouse, and S J Bernstein.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. mbroder@ucla.edu
• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001 Jul 1;185(1):97-102.

ObjectiveOur purpose was to evaluate the agreement between the documentation of symptoms leading to hysterectomy and the assessment of those symptoms by the patient.Study DesignA retrospective study was performed of 497 women in southern California who had hysterectomies. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated for the medical records and were compared with patient interviews for the presence and severity of symptoms.ResultsThe medical record was 93% sensitive and 61% specific for identifying bleeding and 79% sensitive and 55% specific for identifying pain. Overall agreement between physician records and patient interviews was moderate for bleeding (kappa, 0.55-0.58), fair for pain (kappa, 0.29-0.34), and poor for impairment as a result of bleeding or pain (kappa, 0.0-0.14).ConclusionsPhysician overestimation of symptoms could lead to overuse of hysterectomy, whereas underestimation could result in underuse. Our results suggest that both underestimation and overestimation occur for patients with abnormal bleeding, pain, or both. If physicians accurately assess symptoms but fail to document them, examinations of appropriateness will be faulty unless patients are interviewed.

20 keywords...

hide…