• Spine · May 2000

    The efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar fusion in sheep.

    • H G Baramki, T Steffen, P Lander, M Chang, and D Marchesi.
    • Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
    • Spine. 2000 May 1;25(9):1053-60.

    Study DesignAn animal study was performed to evaluate lumbar spinal fusion radiologically and mechanically.ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis in sheep.Summary Of Background DataPosterolateral spinal arthrodesis with autologous bone graft is the gold standard procedure for lumbar fusion. The procedure for harvesting bone from the iliac crest increases morbidity. Interconnected porous hydroxyapatite has been used effectively as an alternative to cancellous bone graft material in metaphyseal bone defects. Little is known about the efficacy of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in achieving lumbar spinal fusion.MethodsFour groups of seven sheep underwent bisegmental posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation using different intertransverse graft material. In group 1, no graft material was used. In group 2, autologous bone was used. Group 3 had interconnected porous hydroxyapatite. Group 4 had an equip of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite and autologous bone. The animals were killed at 20 weeks after surgery. Radiographs and computed tomography images were obtained. The fusion masses were graded for bone resorption and trabecular connectivity on the computed tomography images. Mechanical testing of the specimens was performed, and the three-dimensional segmental motion was measured in flexion/extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending.ResultsThe radiographic images were difficult to interpret because of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules. According to mechanical stability criteria, the fusion rate for the different groups was as follows: 100% (14/14) for the autologous bone group, 72% (10/14) for the bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, 50% (7/14) for the pure interconnected porous hydroxyapatite group, and 15% (2/14) for the sham group.ConclusionsSpinal arthrodesis using interconnected porous hydroxyapatite alone or mixed with bone as graft material reduced segmental motion. It was not, however, as effective as autologous bone graft material in achieving spinal arthrodesis. The sheep model using autologous bone achieved a 100% fusion rate. Because the nonunion rate for a single level in humans may be as high as 40%, the fusion rate with bone/interconnected porous hydroxyapatite in humans may be lower than the 72% found in the sheep model. The little resorption of the radiodense interconnected porous hydroxyapatite granules made the radiologic evaluation of the fusion masses difficult.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…