• Int J Surg · Jun 2007

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of cardiac outputs during major surgery using the Deltex CardioQ oesophageal Doppler monitor and the Novametrix-Respironics NICO: a prospective observational study.

    • D W Green.
    • Department of Anaesthetics, Intensive Care and Pain relief, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, England, UK. david.w.green@kcl.ac.uk <david.w.green@kcl.ac.uk>
    • Int J Surg. 2007 Jun 1;5(3):176-82.

    IntroductionRecent studies have emphasised the importance of optimisation of intraoperative fluid administration in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. A variety of non-invasive devices capable of measuring cardiac output are available for this purpose. Most studies have used the Deltex CardioQ Oesophageal Doppler monitor (DCQ ODM, Deltex, Chichester, Sussex, UK). A relatively new, totally non-invasive cardiac monitor is now available, the Novametrix-Respironics NICO machine (Novametrix-Respironics, USA).AimsThis pilot study compared cardiac output values obtained during major abdominal surgery from the simultaneous use of these two devices.ObjectivesTo assess the reproducibility and consistency of the readings obtained to determine whether these monitors can be used interchangeably for optimising perioperative fluid administration.Methods182 simultaneous paired cardiac output readings were obtained from 12 consecutive patients undergoing prolonged major abdominal surgery. These were analysed using correlation coefficients, scattergrams and Bland Altman plots.ResultsAlthough the r value obtained for correlation was 0.3639 (p<0.0001), the Bland Altman plot showed significant differences of between -4.1 and +5.1 lpm between the readings means with a bias of 0.5 lpm for the NICO over the DCQ ODM. In addition, a sequential plot of simultaneous cardiac outputs showed great disparity between the two devices in some patients.ConclusionCaution should be exercised before using these monitors to optimise intraoperative fluid administration as potentially very large volumes of fluid may be administered to achieve surrogate endpoints. These devices need to be compared side by side with a gold standard method of determining cardiac output before they can be used interchangeably for optimising intraoperative fluid administration in abdominal surgery.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.