• Steven Yule, Rhona Flin, Nicola Maran, David Rowley, George Youngson, and Simon Paterson-Brown.
• School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2UB, Scotland, United Kingdom. s.j.yule@abdn.ac.uk
• World J Surg. 2008 Apr 1;32(4):548-56.

BackgroundPrevious research has shown that surgeons' intraoperative non-technical skills are related to surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the NOTSS (Non-technical Skills for Surgeons) behavior rating system. Based on task analysis, the system incorporates five categories of skills for safe surgical practice (Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Task Management, Communication & Teamwork, and Leadership).MethodsConsultant (attending) surgeons (n = 44) from five Scottish hospitals attended one of six experimental sessions and were trained to use the NOTSS system. They then used the system to rate consultant surgeons' behaviors in six simulated operating room scenarios that were presented using video. Surgeons' ratings of the behaviors demonstrated in each scenario were compared to expert ratings ("accuracy"), and assessed for inter-rater reliability and internal consistency.ResultsThe NOTSS system had a consistent internal structure. Although raters had minimal training, rating "accuracy" for acceptable/unacceptable behavior was above 60% for all categories, with mean of 0.67 scale points difference from reference (expert) ratings (on 4-point scale). For inter-rater reliability, the mean values of within-group agreement (r (wg)) were acceptable for the categories Communication & Teamwork (.70), and Leadership (.72), but below a priori criteria for other categories. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated high agreement using average measures (values were .95-.99).ConclusionsWith the requisite training, the prototype NOTSS system could be used reliably by surgeons to observe and rate surgeons' behaviors. The instrument should now be tested for usability in the operating room.

13 keywords...

hide…