• Christina R Marmarou, Susan A Walker, C Lynn Davis, and John T Povlishock.
• Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
• J. Neurotrauma. 2005 Oct 1;22(10):1066-80.

AbstractTraumatic axonal injury (TAI) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) contributes to morbidity and mortality. TAI involves intra-axonal changes assumed to progress to impaired axonal transport (IAT), disconnection, and axonal bulb formation. Immunocytochemical studies employing antibodies to amyloid precursor protein (APP), a marker of IAT and RMO14, a marker of neurofilament compaction (NFC), have shown that TAI involves both NFC and IAT, with the suggestion that NFC leads to IAT. Recently, new data has suggested that NFC may occur independently of IAT. The objective of this study was to determine quantitatively the precise relationship between NFC and IAT. Following TBI, rats were studied at 30 min, 3 h, and 24 h. Using single-label immunocytochemistry employing the antibodies RM014, APP, or a combined labeling strategy targeting APP/RMO14 in aggregate, the immunoreactive (IR) profiles were counted in the corticospinal tract (CSpT) and medial lemniscus (ML). In the CSpT, the number of axons demonstrating RMO14-IR approximated the number of axons showing APP-IR, with the APP-IR population showing a significant increase over 24 h (p < 0.05). The sum of both single-label counts equaled the aggregate APP/RMO14 numbers, demonstrating little relationship between NFC and IAT. In the ML, 75% of fibers demonstrated a separation of APP-IR and NFC-IR; however, 25% of the ML fibers showed co-localization of APP-IR and RMO14. The results of these studies indicate that, in the majority of damaged axons, NFC is not associated with IAT. Our findings argue for the use of multiple markers when evaluating the extent of TAI or the efficacy of therapies targeting the treatment of TAI.

24 keywords...

hide…