• Katherine L Byar, June E Eilers, and Suzanne L Nuss.
• University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. klbyar@unmc.edu
• Cancer Nurs. 2005 Mar 1;28(2):148-57.

AbstractThis cross-sectional study used a mailed survey to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) of individuals at least 5 years post-autologous stem cell transplant and to determine instrument preference. Instruments selected were the Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form (MOS-SF-36) as the generic measure and the City of Hope-Quality of Life-Bone Marrow Transplant (COH-BMT) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) as transplant-specific measures. Subjects received the MOS-SF-36 and were randomized to receive (1) COH-BMT, (2) FACT-BMT, or (3) COH-BMT and FACT-BMT. Ninety-two subjects returned completed forms, for a 56% response rate. A study-specific form indicated subjects preferred the BMT-specific instruments. The health of the majority of subjects (85%) was similar to or somewhat better than what it was the previous year. Their MOS-SF-36 scores for physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health subscales were lower than the values for the general population, but those for the other subscales were not significantly different. When compared to the data reported by Hann and colleagues for posttransplant in breast cancer, study subjects scored significantly lower on all scales except General Health and Mental Health. COH-BMT scores compared with those reported by Whedon and Ferrel (Semin Oncol Nurs. 1994;10:42-57) were higher for Physical Well-Being, Spiritual Well-Being, and Global QOL. FACT-BMT results compared with those reported by McQuellen et al (Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997;19:357-368) showed that Physical, Social/Family, Emotional, and Functional Scores were similar; only BMT scores were significantly different. Research is needed to determine when QOL plateaus and whether instrument preference changes over time. Awareness of long-term effects that affect QOL can guide program revisions and facilitate decisions regarding the need for supportive rehabilitative services.

31 keywords...

hide…