• Ann Am Thorac Soc · Sep 2015

    Validation and Extension of the ProVent Score for One-year Mortality in Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.

    • Chiedozie I Udeh, Brent Hadder, and Belinda L Udeh.
    • Cleveland Clinic, Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States ; udehc@ccf.org.
    • Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Sep 29.

    RationalePrognostic models can inform management decisions for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. The ProVent score was developed to predict one-year mortality in these patients. External evaluation of such models is needed before they are adopted for routine use.ObjectiveThe goal was to perform an independent external validation of the modified ProVent score and assess for spectrum extension at 14 days of mechanical ventilation.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort analysis of patients who received prolonged mechanical ventilation at the University of Iowa Hospitals. Patients who received ≥ 14 days of mechanical ventilation were identified from a database. Manual review of their medical records was performed to abstract relevant data including the four model variables at days 14 and 21 of mechanical ventilation. Vital status at one year was checked in the medical records or the social security death index. Logistic regressions examined the associations between the different variables and mortality. Model performance at 14-20 days and 21+ days was assessed for discrimination by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit-test.Results180 patients (21+ days) and 218 patients (14-20 days) were included. Overall, 75% were surgical patients. One year mortality was 51% for 21+ days and 32% for 14-20 days of mechanical ventilation. Age > 65 years was the strongest predictor of mortality at one year in all cohorts. There was no significant difference between predicted and observed mortality rates for patients stratified by ProVent score. There was near-perfect specificity for mortality in the groups with higher ProVent scores. Areas under the curve were 0.69 and 0.75 for the 21+ days and the 14-20 days cohorts respectively. P values for the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics were 0.24 for 21+ days and 0.22 for 14-20 days.ConclusionsThe modified ProVent model was accurate in our cohort. This supports its geographic and temporal generalizability. It can also accurately identify patients at risk of one-year mortality at day 14 of mechanical ventilation, but additional confirmation is required. Further studies should explore the implications of adopting the model into routine use. 347 words .

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.