• V Mariappa, E Stachowski, M Balik, P Clark, and V Nayyar.
• Intensive Care Unit, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
• Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Nov 1;37(6):961-7.

AbstractWe compared three different cricothyroidotomy techniques on a cadaveric porcine airway model to determine the most rapid, successful and safe method in emergency situations. In this observational comparative bench-test, surgical or scalpel cricothyroidotomy (ST), Cook Melker Cricothyrotomy Kit (CM) and Portex Cricothyroidotomy Kit (PCK) were evaluated. After a familiarisation program, four operators performed five procedures using each of the techniques. A dissected pig airway was housed in an airway training manikin. Time to successful completion of the procedure, complications and anatomical variations in the pig larynx were recorded. A patent airway was established in 20 of 20 (100%) attempts with CM technique, 11 of 20 (55%) with ST and six of 20 (30%) with PCK technique. The CM technique was associated with a higher success rate (P <0.001). There was no significant difference (P=0.4) in the median time (interquartile range) taken to achieve a patent airway; CM 50 seconds (40 to 57), ST 47 seconds (41 to 55) and PCK 63 seconds (41 to 150). There was a higher rate of posterior tracheal wall injury with the PCK technique (n=11) and ST technique (n=5). No complications were observed with CM technique. There were no significant anatomical variations in the pig larynxes. We conclude that the CM technique is safe, rapid and has a significantly higher success rate in achieving an artificial airway in this airway model. Overall, all the participants in our study preferred to use this kit in an emergency situation.

15 keywords...

hide…