• A Serra, G Polese, C Braggion, and A Rossi.
• Centro Regionale Fibrosi Cistica, Azienda Ospedaliera di Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore di Borgo Trento, Verona, Italy.
• Thorax. 2002 Jan 1;57(1):50-4.

BackgroundPatients with advanced cystic fibrosis can benefit from non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) for the treatment of acute decompensation as well as for the management of chronic respiratory failure. This study was undertaken to compare the physiological effects of non-invasive proportional assist ventilation (PAV) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) on ventilatory pattern, transcutaneous blood gas tensions, and diaphragmatic effort in stable patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic CO2 retention.MethodsIn 12 patients two periods of spontaneous breathing were followed randomly by PSV (12 (3) cm H2O) and PAV (flow assist 4.9 (1.3) cm H2O/l.s, volume assist 18.9 (5.1) cm H2O/l) set for the patient's comfort and administered for 40 minutes with 2 cm H2O continuous positive airway pressure. Ventilatory pattern, transcutaneous blood gas tensions, and surface diaphragmatic electromyography were measured in the last 10 minutes of each application.ResultsOn average, both PSV and PAV improved ventilation (+30%), tidal volume (+30%), and transcutaneous CO2 (-7%) while reducing diaphragmatic activity (-30% with PSV, -20% with PAV). Mean inspiratory airway pressure was lower during PAV than during PSV (9.7 (1.9) and 12.9 (2.7) cm H2O, respectively; p<0.05). The mean coefficient of variation of tidal volume was about 20% (range 11-39%) during spontaneous breathing and did not change with either PAV or PSV.ConclusionsThese results show that short term administration of nasal PAV and PSV to patients with stable cystic fibrosis with chronic respiratory insufficiency is well tolerated, improves ventilation and blood gas tensions, and unloads the diaphragm.

27 keywords...

hide…