-
- P Croft and H Raspe.
- University of Keele School of Postgraduate Medicine, Industrial and Community Health Research Centre, Hartshill, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
- Baillieres Clin Rheumatol. 1995 Aug 1;9(3):565-83.
AbstractClassification of back pain is a difficult task. Traditional schemes have focused on the small percentage of cases which have specific causes. Structural anomalies observed on X-ray examination explain only a small proportion of back pain cases, and the emphasis placed on these in the traditional schemes is, as Anderson put it, the tail wagging the dog (Anderson, 1977). Many syndrome classifications are based on arbitrary notions of cause, with little empirical justification and no evidence that they can reliably and usefully be applied in practice. More pragmatic approaches start with the separation of the serious from the less serious, and the distinction between spinal pain and pain arising from outside the spine. The classification of the large majority of back pain cases which are 'non-specific' is best approached by grading the severity of the clinical and psychological features of back pain and their disabling consequences. Such grading schemes also provide the most appropriate outcome measures for clinical and epidemiological back pain research.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.