• Jahangir Asghar, Amer F Samdani, Joshua M Pahys, Linda P D'andrea, James T Guille, David H Clements, Randal R Betz, and Harms Study Group.
• Shriners Hospitals for Children, Philadelphia, PA, USA. jasghar@shrinenet.org
• Spine. 2009 Apr 15;34(8):804-7.

Study DesignRetrospective review with historical cohort.ObjectiveOur study measures axial rotation of the apical vertebral bodies of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with an all pedicle screw (APS) construct versus a hook-rod (HR) construct using computed tomography (CT).Summary Of Background DataEcker et al (Spine 1988;13:1141-4) observed a 22% derotation of the apical vertebrate of the thoracic spine and 33% of the apical vertebra of the lumbar spine when using an HR system (CD instrumentation). More recently Lee et al (Spine 2004;29:343-9) reported 42.5% derotation of the apical vertebra (both thoracic and lumbar) in a series of APS constructs. Currently, there is no comparison series reported between the 2 types of constructs.MethodsFrom a database of 193 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and posterior spinal fusions, 32 patients were identified as having all APS constructs with pre- and postoperative CT scans. This cohort of patients was compared with a historical published cohort of patients treated with HR constructs by Ecker et al (Spine 1988;13:1141-4) Comparison of the groups showed no statistically significant differences for age and preoperative Cobb angle of the main curve (P > 0.05); however, there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in postoperative correction values. The apical vertebral rotation for the major curve was measured from the pre- and postoperative axial CT using the methods described by Aaro and Dahlborn (Spine 1981;6:460-7).ResultThe average preoperative rotation was similar between the 2 groups (thoracic: HR = 22.6, APS = 21.3, P = 0.6; lumbar: HR = 19.4, APS = 20.6, P = 0.7). The postoperative correction had a significant difference (thoracic: HR = 16, APS = 8.5, P = 0.015; lumbar: HR = 13.4, APS = 7.0, P = 0.032). The percent correction of the apical vertebrae showed a significant difference, with 22% correction in the HR group and 60% in APS group (P < 0.001).ConclusionOur study finds axial rotation correction using APSs and a direct vertebral body derotation technique was significantly greater than that obtained with the HR construct.

22 keywords...

hide…