• Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi · Jan 2011

    Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Efficacy comparison between dynamic hip screw combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating femoral neck fractures].

    • Zhibing Chen, Guanglin Wang, Jiasheng Lin, Tianfu Yang, Yue Fang, Lei Liu, and Hui Zhang.
    • Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, P.R. China.
    • Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan 1;25(1):26-9.

    ObjectiveTo compare the curative effect of dynamic hip screw (DHS) combined with anti-rotation screw and cannulated screw in treating patients with Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture and to provide the basis for the choice of surgical procedure.MethodsBetween March 2008 and September 2009, 51 patients with fresh Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture were treated with DHS combined with anti-rotation screw (DHS group) and three cannulated screws (cannulated screw group). The DHS group included 23 patients, 13 males and 10 females, aging 27-59 years (mean, 43.2 years); fracture was caused by falling in 1 case, by traffic accident in 17, by falling from height in 5 with a mean time of 27 hours from injury to hospitalization (range, 12-70 hours); and 23 fractures included 9 Pauwels type II and 14 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. The cannulated screw group included 28 patients, 12 males and 16 females, aging 20-60 years (mean, 40.7 years); fracture was caused by falling in 1 case, by traffic accident in 22, by falling from height in 5 with a mean time of 25 hours from injury to hospitalization (range, 9-38 hours); and 28 fractures included 12 Pauwels type II and 16 Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between 2 groups (P > 0.05).ResultsThe incision healing of both groups by first intention was achieved. There were significant differences in operation time, incision size, operation blood loss, the cases of blood transfusion, the amount of blood transfusion, C reaction protein level on the 2nd postoperative day, and hospitalization days between 2 groups (P < 0.05). In DHS group, anatomic reduction was observed in 20 cases (86.96%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (13.04%), while in cannulated screw group, anatomic reduction was observed in 25 cases (89.29%) and satisfactory reduction in 3 cases (10.71%); there was no significant difference (chi2 = 0.660, P = 1.000). The patients were followed up 12-30 months with an average of 14.8 months. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) in the rate of nonunion (10.71% vs. 0), the implant failure (3.57% vs. 0), and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (10.71% vs. 0) between the DHS group and the cannulated screw group. The union time was (94.5 +/- 2.0) days in the DHS group and (106.0 +/- 33.5) days in the cannulated screw group, showing no significant difference (t = -1.641, P = 0.107). The re-operation rates and the overall success rates were 25% and 75% in the cannulated group and were 0 and 100% in the DHS group, showing significant differences (chi2 = 6.650, P = 0.012). At last follow-up, there was no significant difference in Harris hip score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between DHS group and cannulated screw group (P > 0.05).ConclusionThe optimal treatment of young adults Pauwels type II or III femoral neck fracture is DHS combined with anti-rotation screw with an high overall success and less complications.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.