-
Hospital practice (1995) · Apr 2012
ReviewEvaluating the adequacy of fluid resuscitation in patients with septic shock: controversies and future directions.
- Neal Greenfield and Robert A Balk.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL.
- Hosp Pract (1995). 2012 Apr 1;40(2):147-57.
AbstractFluid resuscitation is a cornerstone in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. However, there is little evidence to guide clinicians in its administration. Current guidelines recommend targeting fluid therapy based on measurements of cardiac filling pressures, such as central venous pressure. Static pressures are poor predictors of a patient's response to fluid. Such response can be better predicted by measuring changes in hemodynamic parameters caused by positive pressure ventilation or maneuvers designed to simulate increased preload. These changes can be measured by analysis of arterial waveforms, echocardiography or Doppler, or with emerging noninvasive technologies. This article reviews the current role of fluid replacement strategies and the use of monitoring systems in the overall resuscitation of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.