• Qual Saf Health Care · Dec 2005

    The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals.

    • A M Garratt, Ø A Bjaertnes, U Krogstad, and P Gulbrandsen.
    • Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten, Oslo, Norway. andrew.garratt@kunnskapssenteret.no
    • Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec 1;14(6):433-7.

    ObjectiveTo describe the development and evaluation of the OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ) for somatic outpatients.DesignLiterature review, patient interviews, pretesting of questionnaire items, and a cross sectional survey.SettingPostal survey of adult outpatient clinics at 52 hospitals in all five regions of Norway during 2003 and 2004.Subjects35,719 patients who had attended an outpatient clinic within the previous 3 weeks.Results19,266 patients (53.9%) responded to the questionnaire. Low levels of missing data suggest that the questionnaire is acceptable to patients. Factor analysis of items applicable to all patients produced three factors: clinic access (two items), communication (six items), and organisation (four items). The remaining items contributed to the hypothesised scales of hospital standards (three items), information (six items), and pre-visit communication (three items). With the exception of the pre-visit communication scale, the levels of Cronbach's alpha were >0.7. With the exception of the hospital standards scale, all produced test-retest correlations that exceeded 0.7. Most of the results of validity testing were as hypothesised. Correlations between the OPEQ scores ranged from 0.30 (clinic access and hospital standards) to 0.73 (communication and information). As hypothesised, scores were significantly related to patient responses to questions about overall satisfaction, general health and age.ConclusionsThe OPEQ is a self-administered questionnaire that includes the most important aspects of patient experience from an outpatient perspective. It has good evidence for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…