• Biomed Tech (Berl) · Apr 2003

    [Outcome predictors in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus].

    • U Meier.
    • Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin. ullrich.meier@ukb.de
    • Biomed Tech (Berl). 2003 Apr 1;48(4):74-81.

    AbstractDespite the accumulation of knowledge over the years, the postoperative results of shunt implantation in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) have shown little improvement. This means that reliable predictors of the course of the disease need to be identified. In a prospective study carried out between 1982 and 2000 we re-examined 155 (78%) of 200 NPH patients treated by shunt implantation, 7 months after their operation. On the basis of the results of the intrathecal infusion test NPH was graded early stage (no brain atrophy) or late stage (brain atrophy). We looked at the following factors as possible predictors: patient's age, disease duration, idiopathic or secondary aetiology, clinical signs such as gait ataxia, dementia and urinary incontinence, results of spinal tap, valve type and valve infection, and resistance to cerebral spinal fluid outflow and postoperative changes in ventricular size. As a measure for outcome we used the NPH recovery rate, and the Pearson chi-square test for statistical evaluation. 80 patients with early stage NPH, a history < 1 year, absence of dementia and an implanted Miethke dual-switch valve proved to be significant predictors of a positive outcome. Outflow resistance proved to have only minimal impact on outcome. The 75 patients with late-stage NPH had better outcome when dementia was absent, outflow resistance was > 20 mmHgmin/ml, the CSF tap test was positive, and a Miethke dual-switch valve was implanted.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.