-
Journal of anesthesia · Jan 2009
Randomized Controlled TrialThe impact of two arterial catheters, different in diameter and length, on postcannulation radial artery diameter, blood flow, and occlusion in atherosclerotic patients.
- H Evren Eker, Acar Tuzuner, Ali Abbas Yilmaz, Zekeriyya Alanoglu, and Yesim Ates.
- Department of Anesthesiology and ICM, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
- J Anesth. 2009 Jan 1;23(3):347-52.
PurposeArterial cannulation is a common intervention in anesthesia practice. However, the success rates and complications of radial arterial cannulation with 20-G or smaller catheters in patients with atherosclerosis have been underevaluated. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the efficacy of and complications with 20- and 22-G catheters for radial arterial cannulation in atherosclerotic patients.MethodsThirty patients with atherosclerosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III-IV, undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled in the study. Radial artery cannulation was performed in group 20G (n = 15) with a 20-gauge (20 x 1.1 x 33 mm; flow, 61 ml.min(-1)) catheter and in group 22G (n = 15) with a 22-gauge (22 x 0.9 x 25 mm; flow, 36 ml.min(-1)) catheter. Radial artery systolic blood flow (SBF) and radial artery diameter (RAD) were assessed by a Doppler ultrasound probe before cannulation and 24 h after decannulation for vascular complications. The number of puncture attempts, arterial blood gas samples, and manual flushes; total heparinized solution consumption; duration of cannulation; decannulated radial arterial systolic blood flow; postcannulation RAD; and vascular complications such as occlusion, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, bleeding, and thrombosis were noted. The Mann Whitney U-test, chi(2) test, and one-sample t-test were used. Values are expressed as medians and quartiles and P < 0.05 was considered as significant.ResultsThe number of puncture attempts was greater in group 20G (range, 1 to 4) than in group 22G (range, 1 to 2; P = 0.02). In group 20G patients, postoperative RAD was larger than preoperative RAD (P = 0.02) and postoperative SBF was lower than preoperative SBF (P = 0.03). In group 22G patients postoperative SBF was higher than preoperative SBF (P = 0.03), while there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative RAD. The occlusion rate of atherosclerotic radial arteries was 6% with the 22-gauge catheter and 26% with the 20-gauge catheter (P = 0.02).ConclusionA 22-gauge catheter for radial arterial cannulation in patients with atherosclerosis provides unchanged postcannulated radial artery diameter, decreases postcannulation complications, and improves the first-attempt success rate.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.