• JAMA · May 2002

    Review Historical Article Guideline

    Anthrax as a biological weapon, 2002: updated recommendations for management.

    • Thomas V Inglesby, Tara O'Toole, Donald A Henderson, John G Bartlett, Michael S Ascher, Edward Eitzen, Arthur M Friedlander, Julie Gerberding, Jerome Hauer, James Hughes, Joseph McDade, Michael T Osterholm, Gerald Parker, Trish M Perl, Philip K Russell, Kevin Tonat, and Working Group on Civilian Biodefense.
    • Johns Hopkins Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA. tvi@jhsph.edu
    • JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2236-52.

    ObjectiveTo review and update consensus-based recommendations for medical and public health professionals following a Bacillus anthracis attack against a civilian population.ParticipantsThe working group included 23 experts from academic medical centers, research organizations, and governmental, military, public health, and emergency management institutions and agencies.EvidenceMEDLINE databases were searched from January 1966 to January 2002, using the Medical Subject Headings anthrax, Bacillus anthracis, biological weapon, biological terrorism, biological warfare, and biowarfare. Reference review identified work published before 1966. Participants identified unpublished sources.Consensus ProcessThe first draft synthesized the gathered information. Written comments were incorporated into subsequent drafts. The final statement incorporated all relevant evidence from the search along with consensus recommendations.ConclusionsSpecific recommendations include diagnosis of anthrax infection, indications for vaccination, therapy, postexposure prophylaxis, decontamination of the environment, and suggested research. This revised consensus statement presents new information based on the analysis of the anthrax attacks of 2001, including developments in the investigation of the anthrax attacks of 2001; important symptoms, signs, and laboratory studies; new diagnostic clues that may help future recognition of this disease; current anthrax vaccine information; updated antibiotic therapeutic considerations; and judgments about environmental surveillance and decontamination.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…