• Bai-Chuan Su, Chih-Chung Lin, Chih-Wen Su, Yu-Ling Hui, Yung-Fong Tsai, Ming-Wen Yang, and Ping-Wing Lui.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2008 Dec 1;46(4):171-7.

BackgroundThe ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM; USCOM Pty. Ltd., Sydney, NSW, Australia) has been accepted as a noninvasive device for measuring cardiac function in various clinical conditions. The present study aimed at comparing the accuracy of this device with that of the thermodilution technique in recipients in the early postoperative period after liver transplantation.MethodsFifteen mechanically ventilated patients were studied on the first postoperative day after liver transplantation. We compared the left-sided and right-sided cardiac output (CO) determined by USCOM with that obtained from the thermodilution technique with a pulmonary artery catheter every 8 hours in the intensive care unit. Each patient received a total of four paired measurements. Bland-Altman analysis was used for bias and precision testing. The CO measured by USCOM and the thermodilution method were considered interchangeable if the limits of agreement lay within +/- 1 L per minute or 20% of the mean CO.ResultsForty-eight paired left-sided CO measurements were obtained from 12 patients. Three patients were excluded due to unacceptable signals. Comparison of these two techniques revealed a bias of 0.13 L per minute and limits of agreement at -0.65 L and 0.92 L per minute. Fifty-six paired right-sided CO measurements were obtained from 14 patients with one patient excluded due to an unobtainable optimal signal. A bias of 0.11 L per minute with limits of agreement at -0.51 L and 0.72 L per minute were found for these two techniques.ConclusionThis is the first study to evaluate the accuracy of USCOM in the post-liver transplant setting. This device is accurate in measuring CO in liver transplant recipients postoperatively. Possible risks of arrhythmia, infection and pulmonary artery rupture can be avoided because of its noninvasive nature. USCOM should be considered as an alternative in hemodynamic monitoring after liver transplantation.

16 keywords...

hide…