• J Pediatr Orthop · Apr 2012

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Correction of moderate (<70 degrees) Lenke 1A and 2A curve patterns: comparison of hybrid and all-pedicle screw systems at 2-year follow-up.

    • Scott J Luhmann, Lawrence G Lenke, Mark Erickson, Keith H Bridwell, and B Stephens Richards.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA. luhmanns@wustl.edu
    • J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Apr 1;32(3):253-8.

    BackgroundMultiple reports have demonstrated the superiority of all-pedicle screw constructs, over hybrid and hook constructs, for severe sagittal and coronal deformities (>70 degrees) and have made anterior spinal releasing unnecessary for almost all spinal deformities. However, for lesser deformities, specifically coronal deformities <70 degrees, published studies have not been able to consistently demonstrate clinical superiority of all-pedicle screw constructs over hook or hybrid constructs.MethodsA prospective, multicenter database on AIS identified patients with <70 degrees main thoracic (MT) curves surgically treated with a posterior spinal fusion. Inclusion criteria were: Lenke 1A and 2A curve patterns, neurologically normal, primary surgery only, and at least 13 years of age at surgery or be Risser 3 or greater and a construct consisting of all-pedicle screws (PS) or hybrid instrumentation. Minimum follow-up was 2 years postoperative. Patients were excluded if surgeries included any releases (laminectomies, ligament releases, or osteotomies), which may increase curve flexibility.ResultsA total of 101 patients satisfied the criteria for inclusion: PS (n=53) and hybrid (n=48). Preoperative patient data, preoperative curve characteristics, and operative data were similar between the 2 groups. Postoperative thoracic coronal Cobb demonstrated PS had better proximal thoracic (PT) and MT correction, MT Cobb correction % and correction index than hybrid. Interestingly there were no differences in correction index/fixation point between the 2 groups, indicating PS constructs achieved better correction due, at least in part, to the greater number of spine fixation points. Lower instrumented vertebrae tilt and rotational correction was better in the PS group than hybrid. At 2-year follow-up PS had better absolute forced expiratory volume in 1 second values, trunk shift, and total scoliosis appearance questionnaire than hybrids. T5-T12 sagittal alignment was unchanged at 2-year follow-up for PS versus increased kyphosis in hybrids.ConclusionsAll-pedicle screw systems had better coronal correction, lower instrumented vertebrae tilt, MT scoliometer measurements and scoliosis appearance questionnaire total measures than hybrid constructs. The improved coronal correction in the PS group is likely due, in part, to the higher number of spine fixation points than used in the hybrid groups.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.