• M M Chou and I Z MacKenzie.
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China.
• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994 Nov 1;171(5):1356-60.

ObjectiveOur purpose was to compare intramyometrial 15-methyl prostaglandin F2 alpha with intravenous oxytocin for controlling blood loss at elective cesarean section.Study DesignA double-blind, randomized trial was performed with intramyometrial 15-methyl prostaglandin F2 alpha, 125 micrograms, or intravenous oxytocin, 20 U, in 60 women undergoing elective lower segment cesarean section at 36 to 41 weeks' gestation. Subjective assessment of the operative blood loss and early lochial discharge and objective change in hemoglobin and hematocrit before and 24 hours after delivery and the incidence of side effects were compared by nonparametric statistical tests.ResultsThe mean estimated blood loss was similar in both groups, with 645 ml (SD 278, range 400 to 1500) in the 15-methyl prostaglandin F2 alpha group compared with 605 ml (SD 303, range 200 to 1750) in the oxytocin group. The mean fall in hemoglobin and hematocrit was greater in the 15-methyl prostaglandin F2 alpha group than in the oxytocin group, 0.98 gm/dl (SD 0.95) versus 0.65 gm/dl (SD 0.79) for hemoglobin and 2.58% (SD 2.96) versus 2% (SD 2.96) for hematocrit. None of these differences reached statistical significance. There were no differences in side effects and lochial discharge between the treatment groups. In both groups there was a decrease of approximately 1% in maternal arterial oxygen saturation.ConclusionRoutine intramyometrial 15-methyl prostaglandin F2 alpha, 125 micrograms, does not offer any obvious advantage over intravenous oxytocin, 20 U, in reducing operative blood loss at elective lower-segment cesarean section.

27 keywords...

hide…