• Pol. Merkur. Lekarski · Aug 2007

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis].

    • Marcin Kondras, Mariusz Wojtczak, Adam Janiak, Yuriy Mandryka, Tomasz Szewczyk, and Bogdan Modzelewski.
    • Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi, Klinika Chirurgii Gastroenterologicznej, Onkologicznej i Ogóllnej. Marckon@wp.pl
    • Pol. Merkur. Lekarski. 2007 Aug 1;23(134):92-4.

    UnlabelledLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the "gold standard" for the planned treatment of symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Currently this method is used in 88% of cholecystectomy according to world database. There are evidences that laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is a quite safe method which is not connected with many complications.Aim Of The StudyAssessment of the post-operative complication risk and hospitalization time in cases of acute cholecystitis had undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy in comparison with classic cholecystectomy. Evaluation of non-specific inflammation process based on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients' serum analysis.Material And MethodsEighty patients (58 women and 22 men) aged 22-74 (mean 53.6) were included to the study. They were undergone cholecystectomy in the Department of Gastroenterological, Oncological and General Surgery because of acute cholecystitis. There were two groups of patients: 38 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (group I) and 42 patients who underwent "classic" cholecystectomy (group II). No statistical differences of clinical and demographic characteristics were found in the studied groups. There was also the third group of patients distinguished in the study - the control group of 42 patients who underwent "planned" laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of chronic cholecystolithiasis. The patients were qualified for the groups I and II in accordance with randomization rule. The CRP-level of the patients' serum was evaluated in the group I and II twice: before and in the 2nd day after cholecystectomy.ResultsThe mean operating time was significantly shorter in the group I (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) compared with the group II ("open" cholecystectomy) 63.24 and 86.31 minutes respectively (p < 0.05) and 58 minutes in the control group. The mean period of hospital stay was also significantly shorter in the group I (4.12 day) compared with the group II (7.19), (p < 0.05), however there was no statistically significant difference between group I and the control group (3.1 day). The level of serum CRP measured before surgery was not significantly different in groups I and II although in the 2nd day after the operation statistically significant difference between studied groups was obtained: patients who were undergone laparoscopy (group I) had a lower level of serum CRP.ConclusionsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe method of treatment both acute cholecystitis and chronic cholecystolithiasis.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.