• H Mitsuhata, Y Hirabayashi, K Saitoh, Y Horiguchi, H Togashi, R Shimizu, J Hasegawa, and S Matsumoto.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi.
• Masui. 1993 Nov 1;42(11):1623-7.

AbstractWe evaluated the efficacy of epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with pethidine or buprenorphine plus 0.25% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after laparotomy with a midline incision under general anesthesia. Twenty patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In one group (PCEA-P group; n = 10), epidural pethidine plus 0.25% bupivacaine by PCA with 5 mg of pethidine and 2.5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine bolus with a lockout interval of 20 min was added to a continuous epidural infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine (2 ml.h-1) plus pethidine (100 mg.24h-1) for 72 h. In the other group (PCEA-B group; n = 10), epidural buprenorphine plus 0.25% bupivacaine by PCA with 0.03 mg of buprenorphine and 2.5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine bolus with a lockout interval of 20 min was added to a continuous epidural infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine (2 ml.h-1) and buprenorphine (0.6 mg.24 h-1) for 72 h. Analgesia was evaluated by 100 mm visual analog scale and verbal descriptor scale. In PCEA-B group, 90% of the patients did not complain of pain at rest, and in PCEA-P group, all the patients did not complain of pain at rest for 72 h. There were no significantly different analgesic effects between PCEA-P and PCEA-B for 48 h. The average doses of epidural PCA were 1.9 mg.kg-1.24 h-1 of pethidine, and 0.012 mg.kg-1.24 h-1 of buprenorphine, respectively. We conclude that PCEA-P and PCEA-B were effective for postoperative pain to the same degree for the first 48 h, but PCEA-P was superior to PCEA-B for the last 24 h.

19 keywords...

hide…