• AANA journal · Feb 2003

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    A comparison of tubocurarine, rocuronium, and cisatracurium in the prevention and reduction of succinylcholine-induced muscle fasciculations.

    • Cybil A True and Pamela J Carter.
    • Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Tex., USA.
    • AANA J. 2003 Feb 1;71(1):23-8.

    AbstractFasciculations are a common side effect of the use of succinylcholine for tracheal intubation. Many anesthesia care providers prefer to prevent them due to a possible association between fasciculations and increased intracranial and intraocular pressures. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of tubocurarine, rocuronium, and cisatracurium in the prevention and reduction of succinylcholine-induced muscle fasciculations. The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical drug comparison. We randomly assigned 40 subjects to 1 of 4 pretreatment groups. Fasciculations were graded on a 4-point scale. A Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, used to analyze data collected from the fasciculation scale, demonstrated there was no statistically significant difference in efficacy between tubocurarine and rocuronium for defasciculation or between cisatracurium and saline for defasciculation. Significant differences were shown between the tubocurarine and cisatracurium groups and between the rocuronium and cisatracurium groups. Rocuronium is equally as efficacious as tubocurarine for defasciculation. Therefore, rocuronium is a valid alternative to tubocurarine for defasciculation. Cisatracurium is inferior to rocuronium and tubocurarine for defasciculation. Therefore, the use of cisatracurium is not recommended for defasciculation.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…